Measuring Stipple Aesthetics in Hand-Drawn and Computer-Generated Images
Description:
When people compare a computer-generated illustration to a hand-drawn illustration of the same object, they usually perceive differences. This seems to indicate that the two kinds of images follow different aesthetic principles. To explore and explain these differences, we compare texture stippling in hand-drawn and computer-generated illustrations, using image processing analysis techniques and stipple distribution statistics. The image below illustrates one of the results in which different parts of hand-drawn and computer-generated stipple illustrations are compared and their correlation, contrast, and energy is analyzed.
Paper download:
(CG&A, 4.0 MB) and
(CAe, 1.3 MB)

Cross-References:
This technique was later used for generating example-based stipple images, see the page on this paper as well. Also see our survey of digital stippling.
Main Reference:
Other Reference:
| Ross Maciejewski, Tobias Isenberg, William M. Andrews, David S. Ebert, and Mario Costa Sousa (2007) Aesthetics of Hand-Drawn vs. Computer-Generated Stippling. In Douglas W. Cunningham, Gary Meyer, László Neumann, Alan Dunning, and Raquel Paricio, eds., Proceedings of Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging (CAe, June 20–22, Banff, Alberta, Canada). Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, pages 53–56, 2007. Also see the article in IEEE Computers Graphics and Applications. | | ||
This work was done at and in collaboration with the Purdue University Rendering and Perceptualization Lab (PURPL) at Purdue University, USA.




































































































































